Content, user safety and legal rights: what reviewers look for
Rules about what an app may show or enable fall into three overlapping groups. The first is content that harms people directly, such as hate speech, graphic violence and sexual material. The second is regulated activity, such as gambling, financial services, health claims and age-restricted products. The third is rights: whether the developer has permission to use the music, characters, brands and websites that an app depends on.
A common theme across all three is that the developer is responsible for what the app presents, whoever created it. Content written by users, generated by a model or loaded from a partner is treated as the app's own. That is why apps with chat, uploads or generative features meet these rules most often, because a reviewer can test them directly and see what comes back.
Regulated categories add a second dimension: geography. A feature that is lawful in one country may be restricted in another, so licensing, age checks and regional availability become part of what is reviewed.
How Apple approaches it
Apple's safety rules are in section 1, starting with the broad objectionable-content rule 1.1 and its specific sub-rules, then user-generated content in 1.2, medical claims in 1.4.1 and developer information in 1.5. Regulated activity is spread across sections 3 and 5, including cryptocurrency in 3.1.5 and real-money gaming in 5.3. Intellectual property and third-party services are in 5.2.
Apple's user-generated content requirements are specific: a way to filter objectionable material, a way to report it, a way to block abusive users and published contact details.
How Google Play approaches it
Google's equivalent policies include Inappropriate Content, User-Generated Content, Health Content and Services, Financial Services, Real-Money Gambling, Intellectual Property and its policy on synthetic and AI-generated content. Several of them require declarations in Play Console, and some depend on a developer-held licence for each country of availability.
Google's list of approved countries for real-money gambling is an example of a rule where geography, not the content of the app, decides the outcome.
Where the two platforms differ
- Both platforms apply moderation expectations to user content. Apple lists the specific safeguards in guideline 1.2, while Google frames the requirement as a working moderation strategy.
- Gambling is handled through approved regions and licences on Google Play and through jurisdiction licensing and geofencing on the App Store.
- Health claims are reviewed on both, with Apple focusing on medical advice and dosing and Google on claims that could cause harm if wrong.
- Google has a dedicated policy for AI-generated content. Apple addresses similar concerns through its existing content and user-generated content rules.
- Copyright and permission requirements are similar in spirit, and both platforms act on valid complaints from rights holders.
What reviewers typically check
- What a typical user encounters in the first few minutes, including any content generated by users or by a model.
- Whether there are ways to report content and block users wherever other people's material appears.
- Whether the age rating or content rating matches the strongest content a user could reach.
- Whether regulated features such as gambling, lending or crypto trading are licensed for the places where the app is offered.
- Whether music, images, characters, brands and third-party services used by the app appear to be licensed or authorised.
Key terms
- User-generated content
- Anything that people using the app create and that others can see, such as posts, comments, photos or messages.
- Content rating
- A label describing the appropriate audience for an app, set through a questionnaire on both stores.
- Geofencing
- Restricting a feature to places where it is permitted, using location or account information.
- Takedown notice
- A formal complaint from a rights holder asking for infringing content to be removed.
- CSAE
- Child sexual abuse and exploitation, a category that Google treats as zero-tolerance.
Common questions
The developer is expected to take responsibility for what the app presents, which is why moderation and reporting tools are part of review.
A reviewer can prompt them directly, so any gap in safeguards shows up quickly during testing.
Generally not. Regulated categories are licensed jurisdiction by jurisdiction.
Apple guidelines on this topic
Google Play policies on this topic
Platform rules change often. This page is a plain-language overview written by AppReviewFix, not official guidance. Check the App Store Review Guidelines and the Google Play Developer Program Policies for the exact current wording.