AppReviewFix
Guideline library
Google Play — Restricted Content

Financial Services — Financial services

Official source: Google Play Developer Program PoliciesTopic overview: Content, user safety and legal rights
What this guideline means

Personal loan apps must disclose APR and repayment terms; crypto exchange/wallet apps and financial trading apps need to meet additional Play policy requirements and, in many regions, proof of licensing.

Why apps actually get flagged

Common cause is a personal loan app that doesn't clearly disclose the full APR range and minimum/maximum repayment period directly in the store listing, as required.

A real example

"Your app facilitates personal loans without disclosing the annual percentage rate and repayment terms, per the Financial Services policy."

The short version, in more detail

Google's financial services policy covers loans, trading, crypto exchanges and wallets. Personal loan apps must clearly state the annual percentage rate and repayment terms. Crypto and trading apps face extra requirements and, in many regions, licensing. A loan app that does not display the full APR range and repayment periods in its listing is a common example.

Why this rule exists

Financial products can cause real harm if they are misleading or predatory. Clear disclosure helps people compare costs and avoid unaffordable debt, while licensing keeps unregulated services out of the store. Because financial apps can be used to commit fraud or abuse vulnerable people, Google applies firm rules to them and expects developers to demonstrate that they operate lawfully where they offer services.

What this guideline covers

  • Personal loan apps and the disclosure of costs.
  • Crypto exchanges, wallets and trading apps.
  • Licensing and regional availability.
  • Marketing claims about financial products.

What usually triggers this rejection

  • A loan app that omits the full APR range from its listing.
  • Short repayment terms or hidden fees that are not disclosed.
  • A trading app with no evidence of licensing.
  • Operating in a country without authorisation.
  • Marketing that promises guaranteed returns.

How reviewers evaluate it

  • Reviewers check the listing for required disclosures.
  • They request licensing documents where they apply.
  • They test how the app presents costs and terms.
  • They compare claims with the regions offered.

Common misunderstandings

  • A disclosure inside the app does not replace the listing requirement.
  • Licensing needs differ by country.
  • Small lenders are not exempt.

Common questions

What must a loan app disclose?

Key terms such as the APR range and repayment period, as the policy specifies.

Do trading apps need a licence?

In many regions, yes.

Can I advertise returns?

Claims about returns are restricted and must not be misleading.

Platform rules change often. This page is a plain-language explanation written by AppReviewFix, not official guidance. Check the current Google Play Developer Policy Center for the exact wording.

Got this exact rejection?Paste it in and get a diagnosis specific to your app, free.
Decode my rejection
Related guidelines
5.3.3, 5.3.4 — Real money gaming and lottery requirements5.3.1 — Sweepstakes sponsorship3.1.5 — Cryptocurrencies1.4.3 — Substance consumptionGambling — Real-money gambling, games, and contests
AppReviewFix
ProductDecoderPricingGuideline library
CompanyAboutFAQContact
ResourcesGuidesTopic overviewsCommon rejection reasons
LegalTermsPrivacy
© 2026 AppReviewFixBuilt by a developer, not a committee.