Apps offering diagnoses, treatment recommendations, or drug dosage calculations must be backed by a legitimate medical organization or clearly state they're for informational purposes only, not medical advice.
Why apps actually get flagged
Common in wellness/symptom-checker apps that present AI-generated health suggestions without the required disclaimers or credentialing.
A real example
"Your app provides drug dosage calculations or medical advice without appropriate credentials or disclaimers, per guideline 1.4.1."
The short version, in more detail
Guideline 1.4.1 sets a higher bar for apps that give health or medical information. Apps that present diagnoses, treatment recommendations or drug dosing can affect real decisions, so Apple expects them to come from a credible source or to be clear about their limits. Wellness and symptom-checker apps, especially those using AI-generated suggestions, are the usual candidates.
What this guideline covers
Apps that provide diagnoses, treatment guidance or dosage information.
Apps that use sensors or inputs to estimate health measurements.
Disclaimers and the credentials of the organisation behind the content.
How accuracy claims are made in the listing.
What usually triggers this rejection
A symptom checker presenting AI-generated suggestions with no disclaimer or credentialed source.
A dosing calculator that does not name a reliable source for its figures.
Claims that a phone can measure something clinical without supporting evidence.
A wellness app that presents itself as medical advice.
Health claims in the listing that go beyond what the app can show.
How reviewers evaluate it
Reviewers look at who is behind the medical information and how it is attributed.
They check for disclaimers and for clear limits on what the app claims.
They look hardest at anything that could lead to harm if wrong, such as dosing.
Measurement features may be questioned for accuracy and for how they are described.
Common misunderstandings
A small footer disclaimer does not make high-risk medical claims acceptable.
Wellness framing does not exempt an app that effectively gives medical advice.
Using a third-party data source does not remove responsibility for how it is presented.
Common questions
Do all health apps fall under 1.4.1?
No. General fitness and wellness apps are common. The rule focuses on medical advice, diagnosis and dosing.
Is AI health content allowed?
It can be, but reviewers pay close attention to disclaimers, accuracy claims and sources.
Do I need regulatory approval?
Some functions may fall under medical-device rules. That is a legal question separate from App Review.
Platform rules change often. This page is a plain-language explanation written by AppReviewFix, not official guidance. Check the current App Store Review Guidelines for the exact wording.
Got this exact rejection?Paste it in and get a diagnosis specific to your app, free.