AppReviewFix
Guideline library
Google Play — Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property — Intellectual property infringement

Official source: Google Play Developer Program PoliciesTopic overview: Content, user safety and legal rights
What this guideline means

This covers unauthorized use of copyrighted material (music, artwork, video, code) or trademarked names/logos/characters inside your app or its store listing — distinct from impersonating a brand's identity, this is about using their actual protected assets.

Why apps actually get flagged

Frequently triggered by fan-made apps or games that reuse a franchise's characters, music, or artwork without a license, or by apps that bundle copyrighted media files they don't have distribution rights to.

A real example

"We received a complaint that your app infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. Your app has been removed pending resolution, per Google Play's Intellectual Property policy."

The short version, in more detail

The intellectual-property policy prohibits unauthorised use of copyrighted material, such as music, artwork, video and code, and of trademarked names, logos and characters, inside an app or its listing. It differs from impersonation, because it concerns using someone's actual protected assets. Fan-made apps and apps that bundle media without distribution rights are typical triggers.

Why this rule exists

Creators and companies depend on control over their work. If a store distributes apps that copy it, rights holders lose income and users may later lose the app when it is removed. Google acts on valid infringement notices and expects developers to hold the rights to what they include. The policy protects creators and also gives developers a clear standard: content that a developer did not create or license is not theirs to distribute.

What this guideline covers

  • Copyrighted music, video, images, text and code.
  • Trademarks, logos and characters.
  • Content in the app and in the store listing.
  • Responses to infringement notices.

What usually triggers this rejection

  • A fan game that reuses a franchise's characters, music or art.
  • Bundled media files with no distribution rights.
  • Use of a brand's logo in the icon or screenshots.
  • Streaming content that was never licensed.
  • Code copied against its licence.

How reviewers evaluate it

  • Rights holders submit takedown notices.
  • Reviewers compare content with known protected works.
  • They look at how the listing uses names and images.
  • Repeated infringement can affect the developer account.

Common misunderstandings

  • Free to download does not mean free to redistribute.
  • Giving credit does not replace a licence.
  • Fan work is not automatically permitted.

Common questions

What happens after a notice?

Google can remove content and act on the account, depending on the case.

Can I use open-licensed content?

Yes, within the terms of that licence.

Is parody allowed?

It depends on the use and applicable law, and listings are reviewed carefully.

Platform rules change often. This page is a plain-language explanation written by AppReviewFix, not official guidance. Check the current Google Play Developer Policy Center for the exact wording.

Got this exact rejection?Paste it in and get a diagnosis specific to your app, free.
Decode my rejection
Related guidelines
5.2.1 — Third-party intellectual property5.2.2 — Third-party sites and services5.2.3 — Audio and video downloadingImpersonation — ImpersonationInappropriate Content — Hate speech and graphic violence
AppReviewFix
ProductDecoderPricingGuideline library
CompanyAboutFAQContact
ResourcesGuidesTopic overviewsCommon rejection reasons
LegalTermsPrivacy
© 2026 AppReviewFixBuilt by a developer, not a committee.