AppReviewFix
Guideline library
Apple App Store — Design

2.5.16 — Widgets, extensions, and notifications

Official source: App Store Review GuidelinesTopic overview: The review process, app quality and enforcement
What this guideline means

A widget, Live Activity, or notification extension is reviewed as its own surface — it needs to genuinely work standalone, follow Apple's interface guidelines for that surface, and can't be used purely as ad space or a way to nag the user back into the app.

Why apps actually get flagged

Common when a widget is built mainly to show promotional content or an ad rather than the at-a-glance functional info widgets are meant for.

A real example

"Your app's widget does not provide relevant, timely information appropriate for the surface, per guideline 2.5.16."

The short version, in more detail

Guideline 2.5.16 treats widgets, Live Activities, notification extensions and similar surfaces as parts of the app that are reviewed on their own terms. They need to work, follow Apple's interface guidance for that surface and provide real value. They cannot be used mainly as advertising space or as a way to pull users back into the app.

Why this rule exists

Widgets and similar extensions sit in prominent, personal places on the device, such as the Home Screen and the Lock Screen. Because users see them dozens of times a day, Apple wants them to deliver quick, useful information, not marketing. Reviewing each extension as its own surface keeps those spaces valuable and prevents them from becoming a back door for engagement tricks that the main app interface would not be allowed to use.

What this guideline covers

  • Home Screen and Lock Screen widgets.
  • Live Activities and notification extensions.
  • The purpose and usefulness of each surface.
  • Content shown outside the main app interface.

What usually triggers this rejection

  • A widget that mostly shows promotional content.
  • An extension that does not function by itself.
  • Notifications used purely to bring users back.
  • A widget that breaks Apple's interface guidance.
  • Content on a system surface that is misleading.

How reviewers evaluate it

  • Reviewers add and use widgets and extensions.
  • They assess whether the surface provides at-a-glance value.
  • They check the content against the app's own rules.
  • Each extension is expected to meet the same standards as the app.

Common misunderstandings

  • An extension is not a free pass for content the app could not show.
  • Passing review for the app does not cover a broken widget.
  • Promotional widgets are not what the feature is for.

Common questions

Can widgets include ads?

Advertising on system surfaces is restricted by a separate guideline.

Do extensions need to work offline?

They should behave sensibly in normal conditions.

Are widgets reviewed separately?

They are reviewed as part of the submission but judged for their own function.

Platform rules change often. This page is a plain-language explanation written by AppReviewFix, not official guidance. Check the current App Store Review Guidelines for the exact wording.

Got this exact rejection?Paste it in and get a diagnosis specific to your app, free.
Decode my rejection
Related guidelines
Android Auto — Android Auto compliance requirementsWear OS — Wear OS compliance requirements2.1 — App Completeness2.3.1 — Hidden or undocumented features2.3.3 — Screenshot accuracy
AppReviewFix
ProductDecoderPricingGuideline library
CompanyAboutFAQContact
ResourcesGuidesTopic overviewsCommon rejection reasons
LegalTermsPrivacy
© 2026 AppReviewFixBuilt by a developer, not a committee.