AppReviewFix
Guideline library
Google Play — Store Listing

Metadata — Store listing metadata

Official source: Google Play Developer Program PoliciesTopic overview: Spam, copycat apps, ads and deceptive design explained
What this guideline means

App title, description, screenshots, and promotional images must accurately reflect the app's actual content and function — repeating keywords unnaturally or using misleading screenshots is a violation.

Why apps actually get flagged

Usually flagged for keyword-stuffed descriptions written for ASO rather than users, or screenshots that show features not actually present in the current app version.

A real example

"Your app's store listing contains unformatted or repetitive keywords, or images that do not represent actual app functionality, per the Metadata policy."

The short version, in more detail

Google Play requires that the title, description, screenshots and promotional images accurately reflect what the app contains and does. Repeating keywords unnaturally, or showing screenshots that include features the current version does not have, breaks the policy. Descriptions written to rank in search instead of informing people are a frequent source of warnings.

Why this rule exists

The listing is how people decide whether to install something. If the text is stuffed with keywords or the images promise features that are not there, users are misled and search results lose their value. Accurate metadata also keeps competition fair, since honest developers should not be outranked by those who game the listing. The policy treats the listing as part of the product.

What this guideline covers

  • App title, short and full descriptions.
  • Screenshots, icons and promotional graphics.
  • Keyword use and repetition.
  • Claims about performance, ratings or awards.

What usually triggers this rejection

  • A description repeating keywords many times.
  • Screenshots that show features not in the current version.
  • Titles containing prices, ranks or irrelevant terms.
  • References to other apps or brands to attract searches.
  • Misleading claims about performance or popularity.

How reviewers evaluate it

  • Reviewers read the listing and compare it with the app.
  • Automated checks flag repetition and spam patterns.
  • They look at the whole listing, including localised versions.
  • Policy warnings can appear after release.

Common misunderstandings

  • More keywords are not better. Natural language is expected.
  • Promotional images are held to accuracy standards.
  • The title field has specific limits on what it may contain.

Common questions

Is there a keyword field?

No. Google Play uses the text of the listing, so unnatural repetition is not allowed.

Can I mention awards?

Only if the claim is accurate and not misleading.

Are translations reviewed?

Yes, localised listings are subject to the same policy.

Platform rules change often. This page is a plain-language explanation written by AppReviewFix, not official guidance. Check the current Google Play Developer Policy Center for the exact wording.

Got this exact rejection?Paste it in and get a diagnosis specific to your app, free.
Decode my rejection
Related guidelines
4.3 — Spam4.1 — Copycats and app impersonation4.2.6 — Template-based apps2.3.7 — Unique app name and keywords2.3.3 — Screenshot accuracy
AppReviewFix
ProductDecoderPricingGuideline library
CompanyAboutFAQContact
ResourcesGuidesTopic overviewsCommon rejection reasons
LegalTermsPrivacy
© 2026 AppReviewFixBuilt by a developer, not a committee.