AppReviewFix
Guideline library
Google Play — Store Listing

News & Magazines — News and editorial content standards

Official source: Google Play Developer Program Policies
What this guideline means

News and Magazines apps carry extra requirements around editorial transparency — clear publisher attribution, disclosure of aggregated versus original content, and avoiding deceptive framing of content as breaking news when it isn't.

Why apps actually get flagged

Common in aggregator apps that repackage other outlets' headlines and excerpts without clear sourcing, which can read as either misrepresentation or unlicensed use of the original publisher's content.

A real example

"Your app is listed in the News category but does not clearly attribute content to its original source or publisher, per Google Play's News and Magazines requirements."

The short version, in more detail

News and Magazines apps carry extra requirements about editorial transparency. They should identify the publisher, make clear what is aggregated and what is original and avoid framing content as breaking news when it is not. Aggregators that repackage other outlets' headlines and excerpts without clear sourcing can appear both misleading and as unlicensed use of the original work.

Why this rule exists

People rely on news apps to understand what is happening, so trust in the source and the framing matters. Misleading attribution or exaggerated urgency can spread misinformation and damage publishers who produced the original reporting. The policy asks news apps to be open about who they are and where content comes from, which supports both readers and the people who create the journalism.

What this guideline covers

  • Publisher identification and contact details.
  • Disclosure of aggregated versus original content.
  • Accurate framing of news and its timing.
  • Licensing of third-party editorial content.

What usually triggers this rejection

  • An aggregator that shows other outlets' content without clear sourcing.
  • Content presented as breaking news when it is not.
  • No information about who publishes the app.
  • Republishing articles without permission.
  • Misleading headlines.

How reviewers evaluate it

  • Reviewers check publisher information and attribution.
  • They look at how content is sourced and labelled.
  • They consider licensing and permissions.
  • They look at the tone and framing of headlines.

Common misunderstandings

  • Linking to an article is different from reproducing it.
  • Aggregation is allowed but needs clear attribution.
  • Editorial standards apply to apps, not just to websites.

Common questions

Can I aggregate news?

Yes, with clear sourcing and proper rights.

Must I list an editorial team?

Publisher information and contact details are expected.

Does this apply to blogs?

Apps that present news or magazine-style content are in scope.

Platform rules change often. This page is a plain-language explanation written by AppReviewFix, not official guidance. Check the current Google Play Developer Policy Center for the exact wording.

Got this exact rejection?Paste it in and get a diagnosis specific to your app, free.
Decode my rejection
AppReviewFix
ProductDecoderPricingGuideline library
CompanyAboutFAQContact
ResourcesGuidesTopic overviewsCommon rejection reasons
LegalTermsPrivacy
© 2026 AppReviewFixBuilt by a developer, not a committee.